Fortnox: Raised Long-Term Assumptions Following CMD
Research Update
2024-05-28
06:45
Analyst Q&A
Closed
Fredrik Nilsson answered 2 questions.
While the Capital Market Day, as expected, did not feature any new financial targets, Fortnox was generous in disclosing data regarding the two current targets, ARPC and the number of customers. The data showed substantial differences in ARPC between customer groups, highlighting the opportunity for further ARPC growth. We raise our long-term forecasts and Base Case somewhat.
FN
Fredrik Nilsson
Contents
Number of Customers
ARPC
Roffes Bygg AB – Fictional Example Company
Estimate Revisions
Valuation
Appendix Calculations:
Investment thesis
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Revenues | 1,669.0 | 2,078.9 | 2,576.7 | 3,165.0 | 3,845.7 |
Revenue Growth | 28.6% | 24.6% | 23.9% | 22.8% | 21.5% |
EBIT | 672.0 | 850.7 | 1,142.9 | 1,491.6 | 1,861.5 |
EBIT Margin | 41.0% | 41.5% | 44.9% | 47.6% | 48.8% |
EV/Revenue | 21.9 | 19.5 | 15.5 | 12.3 | 9.9 |
EV/EBIT | 53.5 | 47.0 | 34.5 | 25.9 | 20.3 |
Net Debt | -514.0 | -815.9 | -1,409.5 | -2,140.7 | -3,048.9 |
ARR | 1276 | 1679 | 2053 | 2422 | 2834 |
ARR Growth | 23% | 32% | 22% | 18% | 17% |
EBITDA - CAPEX | 667 | 811 | 1,068 | 1,340 | 1,668 |
EBITDA - CAPEX Margin | 40.6% | 39.6% | 42.0% | 42.8% | 43.7% |
EV/ARR | 28.2 | 23.8 | 19.2 | 16.0 | 13.3 |
EV/EBITDA - CAPEX | 53.9 | 49.3 | 36.9 | 28.9 | 22.6 |
NWC/R12mSales | 3.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Fortnox disclosed several interesting data points regarding its customer structure and the difference in customer mix relative to the 2021 CMD. Fortnox has a target of reaching 700,000 customers by the end of 2025, compared to 556,000 by the end of Q1 2024. Assuming a linear growth in absolute numbers, Fortnox is somewhat behind the target, and we expect 647,000 customers by the end of 2025. While management feels confident in reaching the target, it believes it is an aggressive target. Also, according to the 2020-2025 business plan, Fortnox expects a higher absolute net customer intake during the latter parts of the period, probably partly related to a stronger offering to tiny businesses.
Fortnox’s position is strongest among companies with 1-9 employees, with companies with 1-4 and 5-9 employees being overrepresented by ~100% and ~50%, respectively – aligning well with our expectations. Also, we note that less digitalized sectors like Agriculture and Culture & Entertainment are underrepresented.
As shown on the graph above, Fortnox has increased its market share in all relevant size segments.
While analysts (us included) tend to talk about the number of started companies and bankruptcies as drivers in Fortnox’s new customer intake, the graph below shows their small numbers compared to Fortnox customers. Although the number of started companies (about 15,000-20,000 per quarter) has some impact, the bankruptcies of around 1,000 – 2,000 per quarter have a limited impact on Fortnox.
Regarding accounting firms, which bring in about 75% of new customers, Fortnox has strengthened its partnership market share among medium and small firms while it has decreased somewhat among large firms. However, all Big 5 firms remain Fortnox users.
We understand that Fortnox has not lost customers in the Large category. However, due to consolidation in the accounting firm industry, the number of firms in the Large category has increased, explaining the decrease in the share of firms Fortnox works with.
Overall, we believe the data, showing many tiny companies left to win, supports management’s expectations of reaching 700,000 customers by the end of 2025 – although our assumptions are somewhat softer. At the same time, a more robust inflow of smaller customers should have a slight negative impact on ARPC. On the other hand, Fortnox has high ambitions and several new features that are attracting additional larger companies, which might compensate.
The Average Revenue per Customer (ARPC) data highlighted the substantial difference depending on what party is working in the system. While we were aware that the “pure” accountant-managed customers have lower ARPC than customers managing by themselves to at least some extent, we did not assume such a substantial difference.
By ignoring the circa 2% accounting firms, we can estimate the ARPC for each customer group (see appendix for calculations):
SEK per Month | Business rep. | Collaboration | Accountant |
ARPC | 429 | 579 | 29 |
Share of Customers | 15% | 33% | 50% |
ARPC Contribution | 64 | 197 | 15 |
Source: Fortnox (data in picture) & Redeye Research (calculations) |
The ARPC and contribution from customers, which only the accountant manages, are very limited compared to when a business representative is involved in some way. Thus, there is significant ARPC potential in converting customers into collaborating with their accountants. While the size and needs of each customer is important for the potential APRC, we believe the difference in this case largely depends on digital maturity. Thus, we believe Fortnox can move most of these accountant-managed customers over time. However, it is hard to say at what rate.
But what is in it for the accounting firms? Does it not imply less revenue for them? In some way, yes. However, by letting the business representative do some basic tasks, the accounting firm can handle additional customers and focus on areas with higher value-add – where their expertise is needed. From the business’s perspective, the move is rational as well. By doing some easy tasks by themselves, the companies can reduce their accounting costs significantly, which typically will compensate for the SEK~500 increase in software costs. Paying SEK10,000 – 15,000 per month for accounting services is not unusual, assuming a 30% decrease as the businesses do some easy tasks themselves, SEK~500 in additional software costs is negligible.
As for the software itself (we assume entrepreneurs focus on their businesses rather than optimizing their accounting costs), we believe the transition to collaborating with the accountant has switching costs for the business, which probably explains how ~50% of customers are managed by accountants only. However, we expect a gradual migration, partly as the average entrepreneur matures digitally.
During the CMD, Fortnox gave examples of the ARPC contribution from different workflows, Accounts payable, Employees, and Accounts receivables for the fictional example company Roffes Bygg AB.
While the Offerta och Factoring services boost the number by SEK16,000, the other parts bring in about SEK1,600 in ARPC. Thus, even when excluding the two largest contributors, the potential ARPC with current products is well above the current ARPC of SEK276 (R12m). Also, Offerta and Factoring are likely attractive offerings to at least a few per cent of all customers, which, considering their high ARPCs, has an important impact on sales.
Considering the ARPC data shown in the Roffes Bygg AB example and in the Customer segment mix, the ARPC potential is substantially higher than the current target of SEK300. However, the tricky thing is determining how many customers each product and service is relevant to and how fast Fortnox can convince customers to use them.
Our unrevised forecasts assume SEK328 in ARPC in 2025 – slightly above the SEK300 target – SEK639 in 2030, and SEK998 in 2035. Considering that customers that have their own representatives working in Fortnox software in some form have an ARPC of about SEK400-600 today, our forecasts seem somewhat on the defensive side – especially considering Fortnox's ability to raise prices.
On the other hand, the customers managed by accountants might just be smaller and with less need for Fortnox products and services. However, we believe very small companies generally manage their accounts by themselves, implying that the SEK400-600 range is reasonable for most of the customers managed by accountants.
Overall, we believe the ARPCs from customers that have their own representatives working with Fortnox, the company’s pricing power, and potential ARPC from new initiatives – such as payments, expected to launch later this year – suggest a higher ARPC long-term compared to our unrevised forecasts.
While leaving our short- and mid-term forecasts unchanged, we increase our long-term ARPC forecasts following the data disclosed at the CMD. Considering the current SEK400-600 ARPC among customers with business representatives working with Fortnox, we believe our previous long-term forecasts were too defensive. In addition to migrating customers to having business representatives working with Fortnox, there is vast potential for new products and services and price increases.
We leave our 2025 ARPC forecast unchanged while increasing 2030 and 2035 by 9-10%. Although our assumptions are far below potential numbers, we believe it makes sense to keep some defensiveness in forecasts for the very long term.
ARPC (SEK/month) | New | Old | Change |
2025 | 328 | 328 | 0% |
2030 | 694 | 639 | 9% |
2035 | 1096 | 998 | 10% |
We increase our Base Case to SEK73 (66) following increased long-term ARPC forecasts.
Fair Value Range - Assumptions | |||
Bear Case | Base Case | Bull Case | |
Value per share, SEK | 35 | 73 | 112 |
Sales CAGR | |||
2024 - 2031 | 15% | 19% | 22% |
2031 - 2041 | 5% | 8% | 11% |
Avg EBIT margin | |||
2024 - 2031 | 45% | 48% | 51% |
2031 - 2041 | 43% | 49% | 52% |
Terminal EBIT Margin | 30% | 43% | 47% |
Terminal growth | 2% | 2% | 2% |
WACC | 8% | 8% | 8% |
Source: Redeye Research |
Case
Swedish SME’s leading software provider
Evidence
Impressive track record of cost-efficient growth
Challenge
High profitability attracts competition
Challenge
How many modules and services do the average SME need?
Valuation
Fair Value SEK 73
People: 4
The management has solid and relevant experience, although many are rather new to Fortnox. Some institutions are found among the owners, which we find positive. Fortnox's largest shareholder, Olof Hallrup (19%), is present in the board, while other board members and management do not have any significant shareholdings.
Business: 5
The company has a stable and diversified customer base, generating +80% recurring revenue with very high gross margin. Also, the currents estimated SaaS penetration and low usage of some of Fortnox's services allows for further growth, and thanks to its close relationship with the accounting firms, customer acquisition costs are low. However, some of its software, such as the Accounting module, are probably large enough to make a notable share of Fortnox's revenue exposed to single a product.
Financials: 5
The company's debt-to-equity- and the interest coverage ratios are excellent, and it holds a solid net cash position. Also, its growth and profitability figures has been outstanding in recent years.
Income statement | |||||
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Revenues | 1,669.0 | 2,078.9 | 2,576.7 | 3,165.0 | 3,845.7 |
Cost of Revenue | 104.0 | 145.3 | 180.7 | 222.4 | 270.8 |
Operating Expenses | 703.0 | 867.7 | 1,022.1 | 1,206.9 | 1,432.8 |
EBITDA | 834.0 | 1,035.9 | 1,341.9 | 1,703.7 | 2,110.1 |
Depreciation | 17.4 | 19.6 | 14.6 | 12.8 | 12.6 |
Amortizations | 95.2 | 119.9 | 141.3 | 156.2 | 192.8 |
EBIT | 672.0 | 850.7 | 1,142.9 | 1,491.6 | 1,861.5 |
Shares in Associates | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Interest Expenses | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Net Financial Items | -4.0 | -4.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
EBT | 676.0 | 854.7 | 1,142.9 | 1,491.6 | 1,861.5 |
Income Tax Expenses | -106.0 | -177.1 | -235.4 | -307.3 | -383.5 |
Net Income | 570.0 | 677.6 | 907.4 | 1,184.3 | 1,478.0 |
Balance sheet | |||||
Assets | |||||
Non-current assets | |||||
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Property, Plant and Equipment (Net) | 28.0 | 25.1 | 20.0 | 19.7 | 22.4 |
Goodwill | 610.0 | 716.0 | 716.0 | 716.0 | 716.0 |
Intangible Assets | 545.0 | 708.0 | 830.7 | 1,025.5 | 1,259.8 |
Right-of-Use Assets | 139.0 | 135.0 | 135.0 | 135.0 | 135.0 |
Other Non-Current Assets | 66.0 | 67.0 | 67.0 | 67.0 | 67.0 |
Total Non-Current Assets | 1,388.0 | 1,651.1 | 1,768.7 | 1,963.2 | 2,200.2 |
Current assets | |||||
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Inventories | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Accounts Receivable | 680.0 | 840.1 | 1,043.3 | 1,284.5 | 1,563.6 |
Other Current Assets | 72.0 | 90.2 | 112.0 | 137.9 | 167.8 |
Cash Equivalents | 514.0 | 815.9 | 1,409.5 | 2,140.7 | 3,048.9 |
Total Current Assets | 1,266.0 | 1,746.1 | 2,564.8 | 3,563.1 | 4,780.4 |
Total Assets | 2,654.0 | 3,397.2 | 4,333.5 | 5,526.3 | 6,980.5 |
Equity and Liabilities | |||||
Equity | |||||
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Non Controlling Interest | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Shareholder's Equity | 1,772.0 | 2,326.6 | 3,064.7 | 4,022.1 | 5,204.0 |
Non-current liabilities | |||||
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Long Term Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Long Term Lease Liabilities | 113.0 | 108.0 | 108.0 | 108.0 | 108.0 |
Other Non-Current Lease Liabilities | 44.0 | 109.0 | 109.0 | 109.0 | 109.0 |
Total Non-Current Liabilities | 157.0 | 217.0 | 217.0 | 217.0 | 217.0 |
Current liabilities | |||||
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Short Term Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Short Term Lease Liabilities | 33.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 33.0 |
Accounts Payable | 45.0 | 41.0 | 50.9 | 62.7 | 76.3 |
Other Current Liabilities | 645.0 | 778.6 | 967.0 | 1,190.6 | 1,449.2 |
Total Current Liabilities | 723.0 | 852.6 | 1,050.9 | 1,286.2 | 1,558.5 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | 2,652.0 | 3,396.2 | 4,332.5 | 5,525.3 | 6,979.5 |
Cash flow | |||||
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Operating Cash Flow | 646.0 | 803.1 | 1,079.7 | 1,364.7 | 1,689.9 |
Investing Cash Flow | -254.0 | -329.4 | -273.4 | -363.4 | -442.4 |
Financing Cash Flow | -314.0 | -166.4 | -212.6 | -270.1 | -339.3 |
Disclosures and disclaimers
Contents
Number of Customers
ARPC
Roffes Bygg AB – Fictional Example Company
Estimate Revisions
Valuation
Appendix Calculations:
Investment thesis
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article