Fortnox Q2 Preview: Comments on Revised Data and Negligible Changes
Research Update
2024-06-20
10:39
Redeye retains its positive view of Fortnox. While management should have clarified it was talking about the share of accounting firms using Digital Agency in the first place, accounting firms not using Digital Agency make a very limited sales contribution. Thus, the clarified data does not impact our view of Fortnox’s growth prospects. We leave our Q2 forecasts largely unchanged.
FN
Fredrik Nilsson
Contents
Comment on Revised Data
Q2 Preview: Largely Unchanged Forecasts
Investment thesis
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article
SEKm | 2023 | 2024e | 2025e | 2026e | 2027e |
Revenues | 1,669.0 | 2,078.9 | 2,576.7 | 3,165.0 | 3,845.7 |
Revenue Growth | 28.6% | 24.6% | 23.9% | 22.8% | 21.5% |
EBIT | 672.0 | 846.6 | 1,137.9 | 1,485.8 | 1,854.8 |
EBIT Margin | 41.0% | 41.3% | 44.7% | 47.4% | 48.6% |
EV/Revenue | 21.9 | 17.6 | 13.9 | 11.1 | 8.9 |
EV/EBIT | 53.5 | 42.6 | 31.2 | 23.4 | 18.2 |
Net Debt | -514.0 | -812.6 | -1,403.1 | -2,130.7 | -3,034.7 |
ARR | 1276 | 1679 | 2053 | 2422 | 2834 |
ARR Growth | 23% | 32% | 22% | 18% | 17% |
EBITDA - CAPEX | 667 | 807 | 1,064 | 1,335 | 1,661 |
EBITDA - CAPEX Margin | 40.6% | 39.4% | 41.8% | 42.6% | 43.6% |
EV/ARR | 28.2 | 21.5 | 17.3 | 14.3 | 11.9 |
EV/EBITDA - CAPEX | 53.9 | 44.7 | 33.4 | 26.0 | 20.4 |
NWC/R12mSales | 3.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% |
As highlighted today in an article by Financial Times, Fortnox has clarified its market share regarding accounting firms. In the CMD, Fortnox stated the following numbers:
In the updated material, Fortnox states the following numbers:
Fortnox’s focus – the only number stated in the original version – was the share of accounting firms using Digital Agency. However, in the updated version, Fortnox added the share of accounting firms subscribing to Fortnox products – which is considerably higher in all market segments.
While management should have clarified it was talking about the share of accounting firms using Digital Agency in the first place – which management is well aware of – we believe the data regarding accounting firms using Digital Agency is much more relevant. The key question to determine the impact of the clarified figures is how accounting firms using Digital Agency differ from those who do not.
Digital Agency is a tool for accounting firms to overview and manage their customers’ workflows. The offer is priced from SEK299 a month per user, but the Digital Agency has a much higher indirect impact on sales as the managed customers usually do some work by themselves in Fortnox’s software. In other words, the Digital Agency tool allows accounting firms to add high-ARPC customers to the Fortnox ecosystem. From the accounting firm’s perspective, Digital Agency improves efficiency.
In what way the accounting firms not using Digital Agency are working with Fortnox is more uncertain. It could be accounting firms using Fortnox for their own accounting/salaries/invoicing, testing new functionality, or serving single/a few customers. Overall, these accounting firms are not embracing the Fortnox ecosystem and are not working digitally with Fortnox as a base. Thus, from Fortnox’s Byrån (Agency) segment’s perspective, those accounting firms are not customers, so they were excluded in the first version.
To conclude, we believe the direct and indirect revenue from accounting firms not using Digtial Agency is limited. We believe a Digital Agency is a must for accounting firms to deliver high-ARPC customers to Fortnox. Thus, it does not affect our view of Fortnox’s growth potential. Considering this updated data and the data disclosed at the CMD, it is clear that a substantial share of the number of accounting firms and customers are using Fortnox in a limited and inefficient way. Thus, even though the net customer intake might grow at a slower absolute level in a few years, about 50% of the current customers are barely contributing to sales today – implying a large potential in the current customer base.
We expect a net customer intake of 15,000 (15,000) and a sales growth of 24% - almost fully organic. We assume EBITDA-CAPEX and EBIT margins of 37.4% and 38.8% respectively.
We leave our Q2 forecasts unchanged except for a slight increase in Other external costs.
Our Base Case is unchanged at SEK73.
Estmates | ||||||
Sales | Q2E 2024 | Q2A 2024 | Diff | Q2A 2023 | Q1A 2024 | |
Number of customers, eop | 571,000 | -571,000 | 510,000 | 556,000 | ||
Net sales | 501.8 | -100% | 404.0 | 467.0 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | 24% | -100% | 31% | 26% | ||
Core Subscription | 316.9 | -100% | 255.0 | 289.0 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | 24% | -100% | 34% | 25% | ||
Core Transactions | 81.1 | -100% | 64.0 | 78.0 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | 27% | -100% | 13% | 24% | ||
Pengar Transactions/Lending | 67.0 | -100% | 49.0 | 60.0 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | 37% | -100% | 61% | 40% | ||
Pengar Other | 6.8 | -100% | 8.0 | 5.0 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | -15% | -100% | ||||
Marknadsplatsen | 40.0 | -100% | 24.9 | 39.0 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | 60% | -100% | ||||
Gross Profit | 466.2 | -100% | 380.0 | 434.0 | ||
Gross Profit Margin (%) | 93% | #DIV/0! | 94% | 93% | ||
OPEX | ||||||
Other external costs | -69.6 | -100% | -59.0 | -65.0 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | 18% | -100% | 4% | 16% | ||
Personnel expenses | -197.0 | -100% | -160.0 | -180.0 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | 23% | -100% | 31% | 26% | ||
Earnings | ||||||
EBITDA - CAPEX | 187.8 | -100% | 154.0 | 174.0 | ||
EBITDA - CAPEX Margin (%) | 37.4% | #DIV/0! | 38.1% | 37.3% | ||
EBIT | 194.9 | -100% | 157.0 | 185.0 |
Estimate Revisions | ||||||
Sales | FYE 2024 | Old | Change | FYE 2025 | Old | Change |
Net sales | 2048.9 | 2048.9 | 0% | 2544.7 | 2544.7 | 0% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 25% | 25% | 24% | 24% | ||
Core Subscription | 1285.9 | 1285.9 | 0% | 1551.4 | 1551.4 | 0% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 24% | 24% | 21% | 21% | ||
Core Transactions | 337.6 | 337.6 | 0% | 450.8 | 450.8 | 0% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 27% | 27% | 34% | 34% | ||
Pengar Transactions/Lending | 268.7 | 268.7 | 0% | 350.0 | 350.0 | 0% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 37% | 37% | 30% | 30% | ||
Pengar Other | 25.8 | 25.8 | 29.7 | 29.7 | ||
Y/Y Growth (%) | 18% | 18% | 15% | 15% | ||
Marknadsplatsen | 164.9 | 164.9 | 0% | 202.8 | 202.8 | 0% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 12% | 12% | 23% | 23% | ||
OPEX | ||||||
Other external costs | -278.5 | -274.3 | 2% | -331.4 | -326.4 | 2% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 17% | 15% | 19% | 19% | ||
Personnel expenses | -756.4 | -756.4 | 0% | -876.7 | -876.7 | 0% |
Y/Y Growth (%) | 26% | 26% | 16% | 16% | ||
Earnings | ||||||
EBITDA - CAPEX | 806.8 | 811.0 | -1% | 1063.5 | 1068.5 | 0% |
EBITDA - CAPEX Margin (%) | 39.4% | 39.6% | 41.8% | 42.0% | ||
EBIT | 846.6 | 850.7 | 0% | 1137.9 | 1142.9 | 0% |
EBIT Margin (%) | 41.3% | 41.5% | 44.7% | 44.9% | ||
Diluted EPS | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0% | 1.48 | 1.49 | 0% |
Case
Swedish SME’s leading software provider
Evidence
Impressive track record of cost-efficient growth
Challenge
High profitability attracts competition
Challenge
How many modules and services do the average SME need?
Valuation
Fair Value SEK 73
People: 4
The management has solid and relevant experience, although many are rather new to Fortnox. Some institutions are found among the owners, which we find positive. Fortnox's largest shareholder, Olof Hallrup (19%), is present in the board, while other board members and management do not have any significant shareholdings.
Business: 5
The company has a stable and diversified customer base, generating +80% recurring revenue with very high gross margin. Also, the currents estimated SaaS penetration and low usage of some of Fortnox's services allows for further growth, and thanks to its close relationship with the accounting firms, customer acquisition costs are low. However, some of its software, such as the Accounting module, are probably large enough to make a notable share of Fortnox's revenue exposed to single a product.
Financials: 5
The company's debt-to-equity- and the interest coverage ratios are excellent, and it holds a solid net cash position. Also, its growth and profitability figures has been outstanding in recent years.
Disclosures and disclaimers
Contents
Comment on Revised Data
Q2 Preview: Largely Unchanged Forecasts
Investment thesis
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article