Heliospectra: Mixed outlook
Research Update
2023-08-29
07:00
Redeye provides an update following Heliospectra’s Q2’23 report. We find the margin improvements, combined with a stronger-than-expected top line, to be encouraging. However, order intake fell short of our expectations, implying a weaker Dutch market and a mixed outlook in the near term. We have made a few minor changes to our near-term estimates. Our fair value range, however, remains unchanged, with a base case of SEK1.9 per share.
JG
HA
Jessica Grunewald
Henrik Alveskog
Contents
Investment thesis
Q2 2023 Review
Financial Q2 2023: Sales and order book
Financial Q2 2023: Profitability and Cost Base
Outlook
Forecast and forecast adjustments
Valuation
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article
Net sales for Q2’23 reached SEK10.1m, reflecting a significant y/y increase and surpassing our estimate by 31%. The gross margin of 44% exceeded our projected 35%. Ongoing price negotiations led to reduced production costs and, in combination with a favourable product mix, resulted in an enhancement of the gross margin. During the second quarter, OPEX amounted to SEK9.4m, marking an approximately 3% y/y decrease and coming in 5% lower than our initial estimate. EBIT was negative SEK4.6m, in contrast to our projection of -SEK 6.8 million. This deviation stemmed from a stronger top line and higher gross margin than anticipated.
The order intake during the quarter was SEK9.5m in comparison to our estimate of SEK12m. The CEO cited several factors, such as inflation, increased interest rates, reduced energy expenses, and a delayed subsidising program in the Netherlands, as reasons for the order intake being weaker than anticipated. As a result, numerous cultivators delayed their investment decisions to the third quarter, leading to fewer potential projects and escalated competition within the market. We expect the subsidy program to open in September in the Netherlands, which should boost order intake for late ’23 and ’24. Nevertheless, according to the company, the Dutch market has seen a substantial decline of 40% to 50% compared to the previous year. We expect this trend to persist in the near term, leading to ongoing pricing pressures driven by tough competition. Meanwhile, the North American market, particularly Canada, appears more resilient than the Dutch market.
We have made minor changes to our estimates, mainly affecting ’23, where we lowered sales slightly and trimmed OPEX. The forecast adjustments do not result in any changes in our fair value range. Our Base case is SEK1.9 per share (Bull: SEK5: Bear: SEK0.5). Heliospectra is currently trading at an EV/SALES 1.2x based on our 2024e.
SEKm | 2021 | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e |
Revenues | 35.2 | 25.7 | 41.7 | 100.0 |
Revenue Growth | -8.9% | -26.9% | 62.1% | 140% |
EBITDA | -39.1 | -32.0 | -17.8 | -1.5 |
EBIT | -60.2 | -36.0 | -21.1 | -5.5 |
EBIT Margin | -171% | -140% | -50.6% | -5.5% |
Net Income | -60.2 | -36.1 | -21.1 | -5.5 |
EV/Revenue | 2.4 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 1.2 |
Case
Unique offering in expanding market
Evidence
First Smart LED Light Solution Order
Challenge
Limited commercial progress so far and instability in the European AgHort market
Challenge
Instability in the European AgHort market
Valuation
Wide range
The Q2 2023 report came in stronger on all lines compared to our estimates, except for the order intake. Sales, COGS, OPEX and EBIT all came in better than expected. However, order intake is a crucial indicator of future sales. Further, in our latest reach update, we stated that the order intake for Q2’23 would ultimately indicate the market’s response to the new product offering. The order intake in Q2’23 was clearly below our and management’s expectations, implying a weaker market and a constrained outlook in the near term for the Dutch market.
Heliospectra: Actual vs estimates | ||||
Q2'23 | ||||
(SEKm) | Q2'22 | Actual | Q2'23e | Diff |
Net sales | 3.3 | 10.1 | 7.7 | 31% |
Growth | -0.6 | 202% | 130% | |
Gross margin | 0.0 | 44% | 35% | |
OPEX | 9.7 | 9.4 | 9.9 | -5% |
EBIT | -10.7 | -4.7 | -6.8 | n.a. |
Order intake | 5.3 | 9.5 | 12.0 | -21% |
Source: Heliospectra, Redeye Research | ||||
Net sales of SEK10.1m is an increase of 202% y/y and 31% above our expectations of SEK7.7m. The gross margin of 44% is 9pp above our forecast of 35%. Ongoing price negotiations have reduced production costs and, combined with a favourable product mix, led to gross margin improvement. By negotiating directly with A-brand component suppliers and cutting out the go-betweens, the company’s COGS and gross margin should stabilise as we move forward. However, Heliospectra’s business segment is not a high gross margin segment. We anticipate the gross margin to range from 30-45%, depending on the product mix.
Source: Redeye Research
The order intake of SEK9.5 m is 21 % below our forecast of SEK12m. The CEO cited several factors, such as inflation, increased interest rates, reduced energy expenses, and a deferred subsidising program in the Netherlands, as reasons for the order intake being weaker than anticipated. According to the company, the market in the Netherlands declined by 40% to 50% compared to the previous year. As a result, numerous cultivators delayed their investment decisions to the third quarter, leading to fewer potential projects and escalated competition within the market.
The trailing twelve-month (TTM) order intake has been positively trending since Q3’22. As mentioned above, we expected to see a strong reinforcement of the positive trend and a significantly higher order intake in Q2’23.
Source: Redeye Research
During the second quarter, OPEX totalled SEK9.4m, marking an approximately 3% y/y decrease and coming in 5% lower than our initial estimate. Last year, Heliospectra initiated a cost-reduction program. However, the program was introduced in Q1’22, implying that Heliospectra still managed to cut some further costs y/y. The program has consistently yielded positive results during the last five quarters, effectively shaping the company’s cost base.
EBIT was reported as negative SEK4.6m, in contrast to our projection of -SEK 6.8 million. This deviation mainly stemmed from a stronger top line and lower COGS than anticipated.
At the end of the second quarter, the cash position was SEK16m, and the net cash flow after financing activities was SEK2.7m. The net cash flow includes issue proceeds of SEK21.5m from the rights issue in April ‘23.
The Dutch market holds substantial significance for Heliospectra, given its scale and prominence in the horticulture industry. Inflation, increased interest rates, reduced energy expenses, and a deferred subsidising program in the Netherlands affect the market in the Netherlands, which declined from -40% to -50% y/y. As a result, numerous cultivators delayed their investment decisions to the third quarter. Further, Heliospectra’s ability to finalise orders has encountered obstacles due to an absence of reference projects. Growers frequently lean towards more established suppliers. To tackle this challenge, sales and marketing tactics are now concentrated on augmenting brand recognition within the Netherlands and establishing reference growers within both the ornamental and vegetable sectors. Heliospectra is preparing to expand the sales and application team in Western Europe to support these initiatives, anchored by a strategic hub in the Netherlands. We believe a legal entity and sales office will be in place during H1’24.
The North American market, particularly Canada, appears more resilient than the Dutch market. Heliospectra is encountering comparatively less competition in this region, and the existing subsidy programs enable substantial price reductions for the end customers.
Overall, the outlook is cautiously optimistic. The focus is clearly on establishing a footprint in the critical Duch market and on the European market, whereas the North American offers greater potential for securing larger volume orders in the immediate future. Meanwhile, the R&D activity remains high, with several product and platform enhancements ahead that could potentially boost order intake.
Our forecast still implies that Heliospectra will reach breakeven in 2025. Following the Q2’23 report, we trimmed our forecast for H2’23, lowering our topline expectations by 17%. On the bright side, we have taken down OPEX, positively affecting EBIT for ’23. We believe Heliospectra currently has significant pending contracts that can potentially materialise into confirmed orders in the fourth quarter. However, it is important to note that these contracts have not been factored into our existing forecasts. Should these contracts indeed translate into orders, there is also the possibility that their fulfilment could extend into the first half of 2024.
Considering the seasonality of the business, with a weaker H1 followed by a substantially stronger H2, we expect to see quarterly breakeven results prior to 2025. Nevertheless, we estimate Heliospectra will achieve full-year breakeven in 2025. The tables below summarise our forecast changes and forecast ’23e-‘25e.
Heliospectra: Estimate change | |||
(SEKm) | 2023E | 2024e | 2025e |
Net sales | |||
Old | 50 | 100 | 149 |
New | 42 | 100 | 150 |
% change | -17% | 0% | 0% |
EBIT | |||
Old | -23 | -9 | 8 |
margin | -46% | -9% | 6% |
New | -21 | -6 | 10 |
margin | -42% | -6% | 7% |
% change | 10% | 38% | 18% |
Source: Redeye Research |
Heliospectra: Estimate (mSEK) | ||||||||
(SEKm) | 2022 | 2023Q1 | 2023Q2 | 2023Q3e | 2023Q4e | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Net Sales | 26 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 42 | 100 | 150 |
Gross Profit | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 40 | 60 |
Opex | -47 | -9 | -9 | -9 | -10 | -38 | -46 | -49 |
EBITDA | -32 | -6 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -18 | -2 | 14 |
EBIT | -36 | -6 | -5 | -5 | -5 | -21 | -6 | 10 |
Growth (%) | -27% | 26% | 201% | 70% | 30% | 62% | 140% | 50% |
Gross margin | 23% | 35% | 44% | 36% | 36% | 38% | 40% | 40% |
EBITDA margin (%) | -124% | -81% | -40% | -36% | -30% | -43% | -2% | 10% |
EBIT margin (%) | -140% | -92% | -47% | -43% | -37% | -51% | -6% | 7% |
Net income margin (%) | -140% | -92% | -47% | -43% | -37% | -51% | -6% | 7% |
Source: Redeye Research |
Our valuation remains intact, with a Base case fair value of around SEK 1.9 per share. This is based on the financial forecasts in the table above and long-term assumptions outlined in the table below, including:
• Our valuation includes the dilution from the equity issue in April ’23.
• Our fair value range remains quite broad: SEK0.5-5 per share. However, this is quite common for companies similar to Heliospectra. That is to say, high future growth expectations and a difficult-to-assess sustainable profitability level.
Heliospectra: Base case scenario | ||||
Assumptions: | 2028-32e | DCF-value | ||
CAGR Sales | 17% | WACC | 13% | |
EBIT margin (avg) | 16% | PV FCF 2023-2037 | 66 | |
2033-37e | PV of Terminal Value | 159 | ||
CAGR Sales | 5% | Sum PV | 225 | |
EBIT margin (avg) | 16% | Net cash 2023e | 3 | |
Terminal | DCF-value | 228 | ||
Net sales, 2036, SEKm | 718 | Fair value per share (diluted) | 1.9 | |
Growth FCF, 2036 => | 2% | Share price today | 0.9 | |
EBIT margin, 2036 => | 15% | Potential: | 100% | |
Source: Redeye Research |
People: 2
The management team has been subject to a reorganization in 2022 under the leadership of the interim CEO, Bonny Heeren. As management history is limited, it holds back the overall People score. However, Bonny Heeren has an excellent background with deep market insights and connections, adding to the score. The degree of innovation and the proactive mindset are also positive factors in the score.
Business: 3
Heliospectra has expanded into new geographies with an asset-light business model that includes embedded optionality. Long-term tailwinds support the company's operations, and its offering meets a genuine customer need. Exemplifications of why the score is held back; lack of pricing power, market share, a low-margin business, and the absence of a significant portion of recurring revenues.
Financials: 1
Redeye’s financial rating model is determined using historical figures and requires consistent positive earnings. Heliospectra is yet to become profitable, substantially affecting its financial rating. On the optimistic side, we are more than likely to revisit the rating and expect this score to increase as more historical data builds up and the company turns losses into profits.
Income statement | ||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Revenues | 25.7 | 41.7 | 100.0 | 150.0 |
Cost of Revenue | 19.8 | 25.9 | 60.0 | 90.0 |
Operating Expenses | 37.9 | 33.6 | 41.5 | 45.5 |
EBITDA | -32.0 | -17.8 | -1.5 | 14.5 |
Depreciation | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Amortizations | 3.7 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
EBIT | -36.0 | -21.1 | -5.5 | 10.0 |
Shares in Associates | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Interest Expenses | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Net Financial Items | -0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
EBT | -36.1 | -21.1 | -5.5 | 10.0 |
Income Tax Expenses | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Net Income | -36.1 | -21.1 | -5.5 | 10.0 |
Balance sheet | ||||
Assets | ||||
Non-current assets | ||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Property, Plant and Equipment (Net) | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
Goodwill | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Intangible Assets | 18.7 | 19.4 | 25.4 | 37.4 |
Right-of-Use Assets | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Non-Current Assets | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
Total Non-Current Assets | 19.3 | 20.0 | 26.0 | 38.0 |
Current assets | ||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Inventories | 8.9 | 14.6 | 25.0 | 15.0 |
Accounts Receivable | 2.6 | 12.5 | 30.0 | 45.0 |
Other Current Assets | 8.2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12.0 |
Cash Equivalents | 12.8 | 13.8 | 1.4 | 2.9 |
Total Current Assets | 32.4 | 40.9 | 56.4 | 74.9 |
Total Assets | 51.8 | 60.9 | 82.4 | 112.9 |
Equity and Liabilities | ||||
Equity | ||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Non Controlling Interest | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Shareholder's Equity | 12.8 | 13.2 | 7.7 | 17.7 |
Non-current liabilities | ||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Long Term Debt | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
Long Term Lease Liabilities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Other Non-Current Lease Liabilities | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
Total Non-Current Liabilities | 17.8 | 17.8 | 17.8 | 17.8 |
Current liabilities | ||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Short Term Debt | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Short Term Lease Liabilities | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Accounts Payable | 8.9 | 8.3 | 15.0 | 18.0 |
Other Current Liabilities | 12.2 | 21.5 | 41.9 | 59.4 |
Total Current Liabilities | 21.1 | 29.8 | 56.9 | 77.4 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | 51.8 | 60.8 | 82.4 | 112.9 |
Cash flow | ||||
SEKm | 2022 | 2023e | 2024e | 2025e |
Operating Cash Flow | -33.3 | -15.8 | -2.4 | 18.0 |
Investing Cash Flow | -6.0 | -4.7 | -10.0 | -16.5 |
Financing Cash Flow | 42.6 | 21.5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Disclosures and disclaimers
Contents
Investment thesis
Q2 2023 Review
Financial Q2 2023: Sales and order book
Financial Q2 2023: Profitability and Cost Base
Outlook
Forecast and forecast adjustments
Valuation
Quality Rating
Financials
Rating definitions
The team
Download article